|
Cassidulidae
Agassiz l. in
Agassiz l. & Desor, 1847, p.143
Genre type : Cassidulus,
Lamarck, 1801, p.348
Description succincte de la famille :
Système apical monobasal ou tetrabasal. Périprocte supramarginal à marginal,
allongé ou transverse. Péristome transverse. Face orale plane. Bourrelets
bien développés. Présence d'une zone granulaire nue sur interambulacre 5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genre
Cassidulus
Lamarck, 1801
Système des animaux
sans vertèbres, p.349
Espèce type
Cassidulus caribearum
Lamarck, 1801, p.349 (par monotypie)
Extension
stratigraphique (bibliographique,
non vérifiée) : Eocène
supérieur - Actuel |
|
|
|
|
|
diagnose du genre
par Lamarck |
|
Système des
animaux sans vertèbres, 1801, p.349 |
|
|
|
CASSIDULE (Cassidulus)
Corps irrégulier, elliptique, ovale ou subcordiforme, convexe ou
renflé, garni de très petites épines.
Cinq ambulacres bornés et en étoile.
Bouche subcentrale ; anus au-dessus du bord.
Corpus irregulare, ellipticum, ovatum aut subcordatum, convexum vel
turgidum, spinis exiguis obsidum.
Ambulacra quinque, stellata, circumscripta.
Os inferum, subcentrale, Anus suprà marginem.
|
|
OBSERVATIONS.
Les cassidules seraient des clypéastres, si elles n'avaient l'unus
évidemment au-dessus du bord, et par là véritablement dorsal. Ceux des
spatangues qui ont l'anus élevé dans le bord, pourraient être
considérés comme ayant l'anus au-dessus du bord. Cenpendant ce serait
à tort ; car, dans ces spatangues, l'anus est situé dans le haut d'une
facette maginale, mais n'est pas réellement au-dessus du bord.
C'est avec les nucléolites que les cassidules ont le plus de rapports,
et peut-être devrait-on les réunir en un seul genre. Elles n'en
diffèrent effectivement que par les ambulacres, lesquels sont bornés
dans les cassidules, tandis que dans les nucléolites ils ne le sont
pas. Mais sur les individus fossiles, il n'est pas toujours aisé de
déterminer ce caractère des ambulacres. |
|
|
|
|
description du genre
par Kier |
|
Revision of the
Cassiduloid Echinoids, 1962, p.174 |
|
|
|
Genus
CASSIDULUS Lamarck
Cassidulus
Lamarck, 1801. Système des animaux sans vertèbres, p.348. Type species
by monotypy, Cassidulus cariboearum Lamarck.
Synonym : Glossaster
Lambert
generic description
Small, low, elongate ; apical system monobasal, four genital pores ;
petals slightly or well developed, straight, open or closing distally,
poriferous zones of same petal usually unequal, ambulacral plates
beyond petals single pored ; periproct supramarginal, longitudinal or
transverse, with groove extending from opening to posterior margin ;
peristome anterior, pentagonal, transverse ; bourrelets well developed
; phyllodes widened, single pored with slight crowding of pores, one
or two or no occluded pores ; buccal pores present ; adorally,
tubercles much larger, scrobicules often polygonal, with bosses
eccentric anteriorly ; adorally, naked, often pitted area in
terterambulacrum 5, ambulacrum III.
Comparison with other genera. - Cassidulus is very similar to
Rhynchopygus but differs in having a monobasal apical system as
opposed to the tetrabasal system in Rhynchopygus. As
Cassidulus occurs later, in the Tertiary, whereas Rhynchopygus
is from the Upper Cretaceous, and since
Cassidulus
has a more advanced apical system, there is little doubt that it is
descended from Rhynchopygus. Cassidulus differs from
Rhyncholampas in having a smaller, more elongate test, narrower,
nonlanceolate petals, a usually less posterior periproct, and
phyllodes with fewer pores. It differs from Hypsopygaster in
having more developed petals and less pointed bourrelets.
Remarks. - This genus includes most of the Tertiary species
that Lambert and Thiery referred to their Procassidulus, except
for Twitchell's Cassidulus depressus, which Cooke (1959,
p.64) considers a synonym of Eurhodia patelliformis (Bouve),
Desor's Cassidulus amygdala, which also appears to be a
Eurhodia, and Kew's Cassidulus mexicanus, which
is a Rhyncholampas. Many of the pre-Tertiary species that
Lambert and Thiery refer to Procassidulus, including the type
species, have a tetrabasal apical system and |
|
should be
referred to Rhynchopygus. All the Tertiary species that they
refer to Rhynchopygus, except R. dyasteroides Duncan,
have monobasal apical systems and should be referred to Cassidulus.
Cooke (1959, pp.56-59) refers four species to Cassidulus (Cassidulus),
but three of them, C. sabistonenis Kellum, C. gouldii (Bouve),
and C. ericsoni Fischer, are very large, have well-developed
phyllodes, and probably should be referred to Rhyncholampas.
The fourth, C. trojanus is small but has more developed
phyllodes than are usually found in Cassidulus. This species,
like several others, has characters of both Cassidulus and
Rhyncholampas and cannot be referred devinitely to either. These
intermediate forms blur the distinction between the two genera.
There are three American west coast species that belong to
Cassidulus : C. ellipticus Kew, C. californicus
Anderson, and C. ynezensis Kew. I have tudied all the type
specimens of theses species, which are in the Museum of Paleontology
at Berkeley, Calif. The two cotypes of Cassidulus ellipticus
Kew are both poorly preserved, but the specimen figured in Kew's
(1920) plate 39, figure 3a, c, d, shows the adapical surface and is
herein designated the lectotype. The phyllodes are not visible on
either of these specimens, but from the small size of the low and very
elongated test, supramarginal, transverse periproct, and monobasal
apical system this species should be referred to Cassidulus.
The neotype of Cassidulus californicus Anderson also should be
referred to Cassidulus. Althrough the specimen is poorly
preserved, enough of one ot the phyllodes is visible to see that it is
very simple, with only one pore occluded in each haf-ambulacrum. The
test is small and elongate, and the apical system is monobasal. The
specimen figured by Grant and Hertlein (1938, pl.4, fig.7 ; pl.30,
fig.7) is wrongly referred by them to C. californicus. It
differs from the latter in having a much larger, more inflated test,
strongly lanceolate petals with more unequal poriferous zones in each
petal, more anterior apical system, more marginal periproct lacking
and adapical overhang, a less depressed peristome, and less developed
bourrelets. Apparently it is a new pecies of Rhyncholampas.
Kew's Cassidulus ynezensis is represented by one very poorly
preserved specimen which is slightly crushed, with a large part of the
adapical surface missing, and so badly weathered that no details are
discernible of the phyllodes. Kew referred this species to
Rhynchopygus, but since it has a monobasal apical system, it is a
Cassidulus. Grant and Hertlein (1938, p.109) consider C.
ynezensis as a synonym of C. californicus, but the two
species are quite distinct. C. ynezensis is larger, lower, with
sharper margin, smaller peristome, and narrower petals. Range and
distribution.
Range and distribution. - Eocene to Recent of worldwide
distribution. |
|
|
|
|
Certains auteurs (Carter & Beisel par exemple) ont changé le
genre de certaines espèces, les rangeant alors plutôt dans Eurhodia
(cas C. trojanus), nous ne suivons pas cette opinion |
|
|
| |
Cassidulus
ovalis
(Cotteau,1856) |
|
|
|
|
|
diagnose originale de l'espèce par Cotteau |
|
Echinides fossiles des Pyrénées, in Leymerie & Cotteau |
|
|
|
N° 38.
Cassidulus ovalis, Cotteau, 1856.
Espèce oblongue, ovale, légèrement renflée en dessus, subconcave en
dessous, arrondie en avant, tronquée obliquement en arrière. Sommet
excentrique en avant. Tubercules petits, serrés, plus développés près
des pores buccaux. Anus supramarginal. Bouche s'ouvrant dans une
dépression de la face inférieure, rapprochée du bord antérieur et
|
|
correspondant
au sommet. - Voisine par sa taille du C. lapis cancri, cette
espèce s'en distingue par sa forme plus renflée, plus ovale, tronquée
moins obliquement en arrière, par sa face inférieure plus déprimée au
milieu.
Boussan (Haute-Garonne). Coll. Leymerie
|
|
|
|
|
description de l'espèce par Cotteau |
|
Paléontologie française, terrains éocènes, tome 1, p.519 |
|
|
|
N° 132. -
Cassidulus ovalis, Cotteau, 1856.
Pl. 142, fig.
4-8
Espèce de petite taille, oblongue, ovale, légèrement renflée en
dessus, subconcave en dessous, arrondie en avant. Aires ambulacraires
sensiblement pétaloïdes. Zones porifères composées, à la face
supérieure, de pores très inégaux, les internes ovales,
subcirculaires, les externes obliques, allongés et unis aux premiers
par un sillon. Un peu au-dessous de l'ambitus, les pétales
ambulacraires s'interrompent brusquement ; les pores deviennent
simples, beaucoup plus petits, sont disposés par paires obliques et
disparaissent au milieu des tubercules ; ils se montrent de nouveau
près du péristome et forment un floscelle très apparent. Tubercules
crénelés, scrobiculés, très petits en dessus, augmentant de volume à
la face inférieure qui présente, dans le sens du diamètre
antéro-postérieur, une bande dépourvue de tubercules, marquée çà et là
de petites dépressions irrégulières. Péristome un peu excentrique en
avant, allongé, entouré de cinq bourrelets saillants, alternant avec
les phyllodes porifères. Périprocte supramarginal, ovale,
correspondant à une dépression assez sensible du test. Appareil apical
subpentagonal, remarquable par la grandeur de la plaque madréporiforme
; plaques génitales, au nombre de quatre, largement perforées.
Hauteur, 10 millimètres ; diamètre antéro-postérieur, 17 millimètres ;
diamètre transversal, 15 millimètres. |
|
Rapports et différences.
- Cette espèce se distingue nettement de ses congénères et notamment
du C. lapis-cancri, par sa forme plus renflée, plus ovale et
tronquée moins obliquement, par son périprocte allongé, par sa face
inférieure plus déprimée.
Localité. - Boussan
(Haute-Garonne). Eocène moyen.
Musée de Toulouse (Coll. Leymerie).
Explication des figures.
- Pl. 142, fig. 4, C. ovalis, vu de côté ; fig. 5, face
supérieure ; fig. 6, face inférieure ; fig. 7, face postérieure ; fig.
8, aires ambulacraire antérieure grossie. Ces cinq figures sont
copiées dans les Echinides des Pyrénées, pl. IV, fig. 1-5.
Planche 142
(extrait)
|
|
|
|
| |
Cassidulus
ovalis
(Cotteau,1856) - Lutétien,
Aspe, Alicante, Espagne, 36 mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cassidulus
trojanus
Cooke, 1942 - Eocène
supérieur, Hernando Cty, Floride, 28mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genre
Eurhodia
Haime in
d'Archiac & Haime, 1853
Description des
animaux fossiles du groupe numulitique de l'Inde, p.213
Espèce type
Pygorhynchus morrisi
Haime in
d'Archiac & Haime, 1853, p.214 (par monotypie)
Extension
stratigraphique (bibliographique,
non vérifiée) : Eocène
Syn.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Eurhodia
amygdala
(Desor, 1863) |
|
|
|
|
|
description de
l'espèce par Desor |
|
Synopsis des échinides fossiles, 1858, p.290 |
|
|
|
Amygdala
Desor Actes de la Soc. helv. de sc. nat. 1853, p.277. - Grande espèce
très allongée , tout d'une venue, uniformément convexe en-dessus.
Sommet ambulacraire légèrement excentrique en avant. Périprocte allongé,
sans bourrelets. Péristome grand, à bourrelets très apparents,
dépourvus de tubercules. |
|
Terr. nummulitique de Blang
près d'Yberg (Canton de Schwytz). Rare.
Mus. Zurich.
|
|
|
|
| |
Eurhodia
amygdala
(Desor, 1863) - Eocène,
Alicante, Espagne, 25 mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Eurhodia
amygdala
(Desor, 1863) - Eocène,
Alicante, Espagne, 22 mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Eurhodia rugosa
(Ravenel,1848) ideali
Kier,1980 |
|
|
|
|
|
diagnose originale par
Kier |
|
The Echinoids of
the Middle Eocene Warley Hill Formation, 1980, p.26 |
|
|
|
Eurhodia
rugosa ideali, new subspecies
Figures 7, 9 ; Plate 7 : figures
7-9
Material. - Description
based on over 100 specimens from Ideal (locality 12). Dimensions from
48 specimens.
Shape and Size. - Length
17.4 to 49.1 mm, x=31.60 mm, test elongate, width 69.26 to 80.26
(x=75.07) percent L (SD=5.76, CV=24.35, N=48), sides relatively
straight and parallel in some specimens, in others sides widening
posteriorly, posterior margin truncated ; height 32.92 to 44.83
(x=38.16) percent L (SC=2.34, CV=19.81, N=47). Trough extending
downward from periproct ; test depressed adorally along midline.
Apical System. -
Anterior, distance from anterior margin 43.18 to 49.51 (x=46.08)
percent L (SD=3.62, CV=24.79, N=45) ; monobasal, 4 genital pores,
present on smallest specimen.
Ambulacra.
- Anterior petal extending almost to anterior margin ; length 30.46 to
59.30 (x=36.39) percent L (SD=4.19, CV=36.15, N=41) ; width 9.46 to
13.94 (x=12.18) percent L (SD=0.95, CV=24.94, N=44) ; length of petals
II, IV 25.0 to 33.81 (x=29.95) percent L (SD=2.78, CV=29.13, N=40) ;
width 9.46 to 13.94 (x=11.75) percent L (SD=0.92, CV=24.95, N=41) ;
length of petals V, I 31.89 to 43.62 (x=37.82) percent L (SD=3.65,
CV=30.51, N=41) ; width 9.12 to 13.46 (x=11.41) percent L (SD=0.94,
CV=25.75, N=42). Petals closing distally, poriferous zones equal,
interporiferous zones slightly wider than single poriferous zone.
Specimen 17.4 mm long with 40 porepairs in petal III, 40 in petal IV,
50 in petal V ; specimen 48.9 mm long with 98 porepairs in petal III,
90 in IV, 110 in V.
Peristome. - Anterior of
center, distance from anterior margin 34.25 to 38.46 (x=36.43) percent
L (SD=2.95, CV=25.61, N=48) ; elongated longitudinally, height 9.36 to
16.54 (x=12.53) percent L (SD=0.7, CV=18.43, N=47) ; width 7.14 to
14.02 (x=10.58) percent L (SD=0.71, CV=21.96, N=47). Bourrelets
strongly developed. Phyllodes (Figure 9A) single pored, approximately
26 pores in each phyllode, 6 in inner series in occluded plates in
specimen 23mm long ; 28 in each phyllode, 8-9 in inner series in
specimen, 41.7 mm long.
Periproct. - Supramarginal, transverse with trough extending
posteriorly. Enclosed by interambulacral plates 8-12.
Adoral Surface. - Small,
irregularly arranged pits (Plate 7 : figure 8) in midzone of
interambulacrum V ; two-thirds of length of ambulacrum III extending
from extremity of phyllode ; first and second plates of interambulacra
2, 3 and in plate 3 adjoining ambulacrum III ; a few pits in plates 1
and 2 in interambulacra 4, 1. Adoral plate arrangement in Figure 9B.
Type-Specimens.
- Holotype USNM 264046 ; figured specimen USNM 264589. |
|
Occurences. - Castle
Hayne Limestone, North Carolina : localities 2, 5, 8, Rose Hill
locality 11, Ideal Cement Company quarry localities 12, 26, 28 ("early
and late zones").
Remarks. - Specimens of
this subspecies are distinguished from specimens of Eurhodia rugosa
rugosa by their much smaller pits on the adoral surface (compare
Plate 7 : figure 2 with Plate 7 : figure 8). In Eurhodia rogosa
ideali the specimens are wider in the larger specimens, although
having similar width to length ratios in the smaller specimens (Figure
7B). The width-to-length ratio decreases with increase in size in
E. rugosa rugosa. Small specimens of E. rugosa ideali have
lower tests than in E. rugosa rugosa but larger specimens have
imilar heights (Figure 7A). Finally, specimens of E. rugosa ideali
commonly have petal III shorter in the smaller specimens than E.
rugosa rugosa (Figure 7C). In all other characters the subspecies
are indistinguishable including width, height, and position of the
peristome (Figure 7D), location of the apical system in large
specimens (Figure 7E), width of all petals and length of all petals
except petal III, number of porepairs in the petals, and numbers of
pores in the phyllodes. E. rugosa ideali occurs in the Castle
Hayne of North Carolina and E. rugosa rugosa occurs in the
Santee Limestone of South Carolina.
Images d'après
Kier 1980, fig in texte 9A-B et pl.7, fig.7-9 (holotype USNM 264046)
|
|
|
|
| |
Eurhodia rugosa
(Ravenel,1848) ideali
Kier,1980 -
Eocène, Ocala limestone, Floride, 34 mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Eurhodia rugosa
(Ravenel,1848) ideali
Kier,1980 -
Eocène, Castle Hayne formation, Pender County, Caroline du Nord, 38 mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Eurhodia rugosa
(Ravenel,1848) depressa Kier,1980 |
|
|
|
|
|
diagnose originale par
Kier |
|
The Echinoids of
the Middle Eocene Warley Hill Formation, 1980, p.28 |
|
|
|
Eurhodia
rugosa depressa, new subspecies
Figures 7A, 10, 21, 22 ; Plate 7
: figures 10-12
Material. - 62 specimens
from Maple Hill (East Coast Company) locality 10 but only eight show
adapical surface. Specimens occur in living position as shown by the
filling of only the lower portion of the test with sediment - the
upper part is hollow. The specimens occur at the bottom of an
indurated bryozoan "hash" with the upper surface of the echinoids
firmly cemented to the rock making it very difficult to clean this
surface.
Shape and Size. - Length
47.6 to 65.0 mm, x=56.6 mm, test elongate, width 66.34 to 69.33
(x=67.59) percent L (SD=4.69, CV=12.27, N=8), greatest width posterior
to center, posterior margin truncated ; height 25.38 to 28.32
(x=27.43) percent L (SD=1.67, CV=11.08, N=6). Trough extending
downward from periproct ; test depressed adorally along midline.
Apical System. -
Anterior petal extending almost to anterior margin ; length 34.33 to
35.93 (x=35.33) percent L (SD=2.65, CV=13.59, N=6) ; width 9.08 to
9.90 (x=9.41) percent L (SD=0.66, CV=12.71, N=6) ; length of petals
II, IV 25.92 to 30.08 (x=27.91) percent L (SD=2.55, CV=16.51, N=6) ;
width 8.92 to 9.92 (x=9.45) percent L (SD=0.64, CV=12.34, N=6) ;
length of petals V, I 36.33 to 39.40 (x=37.63) percent L (SD=2.94,
CV=14.16, N=6) ; width 8.46 to 9.76 (x=9.36) percent L (SD=0.51,
CV=9.69, N=5). Petals closing distally, poriferous zones equal,
interporiferous zones slightly wider than single poriferous zone.
Specimen 49.0 mm long with 102 porepairs in petal III, 84 in petal IV,
106 in petal V ; specimen 56.9 mm long with 124 porepairs in petal
III, 102 in IV, 136 in V.
Peristome. - Anterior of
center, distance from anterior margin 34.49 to 36.13 (x=35.14) percent
L (SD=2.49, CV=12.66, N=7) ; elongated longitudinally, height 10.77 to
12.65 (x=11.90) percent L (SD=0.54, CV=8.16, N=7) ; width 9.62 to
11.74 (x=9.50) percent L (SD=1.03, CV=16.87, N=7). Bourrelets strongly
developed. Phyllodes (Figure 10A) single pored, approximately 26 pores
in each phyllode, 7 in inner series in occluded plates in specimen
50.4 mm long ; same in specimen 63.7 mm long.
Periproct. -
Supramarginal, transverse with trough extending posteriorly. Enclosed
by interambulacral plates 8-12.
|
|
Adoral
Surface. - Small, irregularly arranged pits (Plate 7 : figure
11) in midzone of interambulacrum V ; two-thirds of length of
ambulacrum III extending from extremity of phyllode ; first and second
plates of interambulacra 2, 3 and in plate 3 adjoining ambulacrum III
; a few pits in plates 1 and 2 in terambulacra 4, 1. Plate arrangement
on Figure 10B.
Type Specimens. -
Holotype ISNM 264047 ; figured specimens USNM 264590, 264591.
Occurences. - Castle
Hayne Limestone, North Carolina : Maple Hill (East Coast Construction
Company quarry) localities 10, 34 ("middle zone").
Remarks. - This
subspecies differs from E. rugosa rugosa found in the Santee
Limestone of South Carolina and E. rugosa ideali found
elsewhere in the Castle Hayne Limestone of North Carolina in having a
lower test (Figure 7A). The pits on the adoral side of its test are
similar in size to those in E. rugosa ideali and smaller than
those in E. rugosa rugosa. In all other characters, specimens
of this subspecies are similar to the other subspecies, including the
width of the test, length and width of the petals, position of the
apical system, and position, height, and width of the peristome.
Images d'après
Kier 1980, fig in texte 10A-B et pl.7, fig.10-12 (holotype USNM
264047)
|
|
|
|
| |
Eurhodia rugosa
(Ravenel,1848) depressa Kier,1980 -
Eocène, Castle Hayne formation, Pender County, Caroline du Nord, 39 mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genre
Rhyncholampas
Agassiz, 1869
Preliminary report
echini, deep water Florida straits, p.270
Espèce type
Pygorhynchus pacificus
Agassiz,1873, p.554 (désignation
subséquente de Lambert in
Lambert & Thierry (1918),
p.369)
Extension
stratigraphique (bibliographique,
non vérifiée) : Maastrichtien
- Actuel
Syn.
Anisopetalus
Clark in
Arnold & Clark, 1927, p. 44 ;
Espèce type Anisopetalus ellipticus
Clark in
Arnold & Clark, 1927, p. 44
Plagiopygus
Lambert, 1898, p. 162 ; Espèce
type Nucleolites grigonensis
Defrance, 1825
Pleuropygus
Lambert, 1913, p. 127 ; Espèce
type Nucleolites grigonensis
Defrance, 1825
Galerolampas
Cotteau, 1889, p.1 ; Espèce
type Galerolampas sorigneti
Cotteau, 1889
Gisopygus
Gauthier in
Fourteau, 1899, p. 648 ;
Espèce type Rhynchopygus navillei
de Loriol, 1881.
|
|
|
|
|
|
description du genre
par Kier |
|
Revision of the
Cassiduloid echinoids, 1962, p.178 |
|
|
|
Genus
RHYNCHOLAMPAS A. Agassiz
Rhyncholampas A. Agassiz, 1869. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., vol.I,
p.270. Type species by subsequent designation, Lambert (1918,
p.41), Pygorhynchus pacificus A. Agassiz.
Synonyms :
Anisopetalus Arnold and Clark ; Galerolampas Cotteau ; ?
Gisopygus Gauthier ; Plagiopygus Lambert.
GENERIC
DESCRIPTION
Medium to large, elongate, oval or with greatest width posterior to
center, moderately to highly inflated ; apical system anterior,
monobasal ; petals lanceolate, equal, closing, with unequal poriferous
zones ; ambulacra single pored beyond petals ; periproct slightly
supramarginal, marginal or slightly inframarginal, transverse ;
peristome anterior, pentagonal, wider than high ; bourrelets
moderately developed ; phyllodes single pored, widened, usually with
two series of pores in each half-ambulacrum, approximately four pores
in each inner series ; in some species three series o pores in each
half ambulacrum ; buccal pores poresent ; tubercles on adoral surface
much larger than on adapical, scrobicules large, bosses eccentric
anterior ; naked, often pitted area in interambulacrum 5, ambulacrum
III.
Comparison with other genera. - Rhyncholampas is
distinguished from Cassidulus by its larger test, broader,
lanceolate petals, generally more posterior periproct, and more
developed phyllodes with more occluded pores. Although the type
species of these two genera are very distinct from one another, there
are species which have some of the characters of both and are
difficult to place definitely in one of them.
Remarks. - Mortensen (1948, p.202) incorrectly states that when
A. Agasiz established this genus he made Cassidulus cariboearum
the type species. Furthermore, Grant and Hertlein (1938, p.107) are
mistaken in saying that C. cariboearum is the type species by
monotypy. Agassiz referred two species to his genus, C. cariboearum
and R. pacificus, but did not select a type species. Lambert
and Thiery designated R. pacificus. Mortensen says that even if
R. pacificus were considered as the type species of
Rhyncholampas, the genus would still be a synonym of Cassidulus.
He states that R. pacificus has more developed phyllodes and
that the pores in it petals are more unequal, but suggests that these
differences may be due to the different size of the specimens examined,
and that if specimens of the same size were compared, the differences
might be so small as to be unimportant |
|
for a generic
distinction. This argument would be pertinent if the species C.
cariboearum were bsed on immature specimens, and R. pacificus
on adults. Such is not the case. Many specimens of C. cariboearum
are known, and none are larger han 31 mm. in length. There is no
evidence that these small specimens are not adults. Fortunately, there
are two small specimens of R. pacificus in the U.S. National
Museum, one 21 mm. long and the other 35 m., and these immature
specimens are generically distinct from C. cariboearum. A
phyllode in the smallest specimen already has three occluded pores (text
fig.154) in each half-ambulacrum, whereas no occluded pores occur in
specimens of the same size or even larger of C. cariboearum. It
is true that the pores in the petals of the small specimen of R.
pacificus are more equal, with the outer pore less elongated (pl.28,
fig.1) than the outer pore in an adult. However, the shape of the
petals in R. pacificus is quite different from the petals in C.
cariboearum. In R. pacificus the petals are lanceolate with
more of a tendency to close distally. This difference is evident even
on the smallest specimen.
Range and distribution. - Paleocene to Recent, of
worldwide distribution. There are many species from the Cenozoic of
eastern United States which Cooke has referred to Plagiopygus (which
he considers a subgenus of Cassidulus) or Cassidulus (Cassidulus),
which probably should be referred to Rhyncholampas, including
R. sabitonensis Kellum, R. gouldii (Bouve), R.
ericsoni (Conrad), R. alabamensis (Twitchell), and R.
georgiensis (Twitchell). Kew's west coast species Cassidulus
(Rhynchopygus) mexicanus is very large, with well-developed
broad lanceolate petals, and should be reffered to Rhyncholampas.
Unfortunately, on the holotype, and evidently the only specimen known
of this species, the adoral surface is destroyed and nothing is known
of the phyllodes. A photograph of the adapical surface is included
herein on plate 29, figure 4. This species is quite similar to R.
evergladensis (Mansfield) from south-eastern United States, also
from the Late Miocene of Florida. Its phyllodes are probably similar
to the very well developed phyllodes in R. evergladensis.
|
|
|
|
| |
Rhyncholampas
carolinensis
(Twitchell, 1915) |
|
|
|
|
|
diagnose originale de
l'espèce par Twitchell |
|
The Mesozoic and
Cenozoic Echinodermata of the United States, 1915, p.146 |
|
|
|
Cassidulus (Pygorhynchus)
carolinensis
Twitchell, n. sp.
Plate LXVII,
figures 2a-g.
Determinative characters. - Test thin walled, oval in marginal
outline, posterior end truncated ; sides and anterior end rounded ;
upper surface convex, depressed, slightly more elevated posteriorly
than anteriorly and with a rather prominent low, rounded ridge above
the periproct ; under surface flat, concave around the peristome ;
apex central or slightly excentric posteriorly. Ambulacral areas
narrow. A narrow granulated, median band back of the peristome. Apical
system excentric anteriorly ; madreporite slightly tumid. Peristome
excentric anteriorly, directly beneath apical system, pentagonal, with
a floscelle. Periproct elliptical, transverse, supramarginal
beneath and overhanging expansion of the test, whose edge is even with
the posterior margin.
Dimensions. - Length 36 millimeters ; width 32 millimeters ;
height 18 millimeters. This specimen is about a fourth larger than the
average.
Description. - This species occurs in large numbers at several
localities in North Carolina, notably in association with
Echinolampas appendiculatus. The test is thin walled, regularly
oval in marginal outline, the posterior end vertically truncated. The
upper surface is uniformly convex, depressed, sides and anterior en
rounded, slightly more elevated posteriorly than anteriorly and in the
form of a low rounded ridge above the periproct ; under surface flat,
tumid near the pargin, concave around the peristome. The apex is
central, or slightly excntric posteriorly.
The ambulacral areas are narrow, dorsal portions petaloid ; the petals
long, rather narrow, nearly closing, the posterior pair slightly
longer than the others which are nearly equal in length. The
poriferous zones are rather narrow, faintly depressed, outer pores
oblong, inner ones round, pairs of pores conjugate.
The surface of the test, including the interporiferous areas and the
ridges between the pairs of pores, is closely set with small
imperforate tubercles set in deep scrobicules. Between the tubercles
are minute granules. The tubercles increase in size on the under
surface except along a narrow band back of the peristome, which is
somewhat smooth but dotted with numerous granulations.
The apical system is excentric anteriorly. There are four genital
pores, the anterior pair being nearer together than the posterior ;
and five perforated radial plates. The madreporite is large, oval and
faintly tumid, as are the adjacent portions of the interambulacral
areas.
The peristome is somewhat large, pentagonal, excentric anteriorly,
directly beneath the apical system, surrounded by a floscelle of which
the bourrelets are rather prominent, granulated, and together form a
nearly circular ring around the peristome. |
|
The periproct is elliptical, transverse, supramarginal, at the top of
the posterior truncation ; beneath a rounded, trnasverse, somewhat
protruding expansion of the test, whose edge is just even with the
truncated posterior margin.
Related forms. - Cassidulus carolinensis is closely
related to C. conradi and resembles it in a number of
features, notably in the details of the periproct ; but it is to be
separated by its less excentric apical system, by its less transverse
peristome with the subcircular ring of bourrelets, by being broader,
more rounded and less rostrate posteriorly, and by having a more
marked concavity around its peristome. C. carolinensis also
resembles C. georgiensis but is to be distinguished by the
concavity around its peristome, its less obtuse and less angular
posterior margin, and its lower and less oblique posterior truncation.
Among European forms C. carolinensis greatly resembles
Pygorhynchus maveri De Loriol from the Tertiary of
Switzerland (more so than does C. conradi), but differs in
having its periproct higher up on the posterior surface, and in the
failure of the expansion of the test over the periproct to protrude
noticeably beyond the posterior margin. In a number of features C.
carolinensis is similar to Pygorhynchus grignonensis (Defrance)
Agassiz from the Eocene of France, but it can be separated by its more
depressed form and the higher relative position of its periproct.
Localities. - Smith Creed (type), Rochy Point, and Wilmington,
N. C.
Geologic horizon. - Castle Hayne limestone, upper Eocene or
Oligocene.
Collections. - Johns Hopkins University (T 2004) ; U. S.
National Museum.
Planche LXVII
(extrait)
|
|
|
|
| |
Rhyncholampas
carolinensis
(Twitchell, 1915) -
Eocène, Castle Hayne formation, Caroline du Nord, 28 mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rhyncholampas
grignonensis
(Defrance, 1825) |
|
|
|
|
|
description de
l'espèce par Kier |
|
Revision of the
Cassiduloid echinoids, 1962, p.185 |
|
|
|
RHYNCHOLAMPAS GRIGNONENSIS (DeFrance)
Plate 28,
figures 4-8 ; text figures 151, 152
Nucleolites grignonensis DeFrance, 1825. Dict. sci. nat., vol.35,
p.214
Material. - Two specimens studied in the collecitons of the
U.S. National Museum, and several, including Cotteau's figured
specimen, in the Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines, Paris.
Shape. - Medium size, oval, inflated, greatest width and height
posterior to center ; margin gently rounded except for slight
posterior truncation, peristome depressed.
Apical system. - Anterior, monobasal, madreporite inflated.
Ambulacra. - Petals narrow, petal III shorter than others, II
and IV extending over two-thirds distance to margin ; petals V and I
over one-half distance ; interporiferous zones over twice width
poriferous zone ; petals closing distally ; poriferous zones depressed,
of unequal length : one more pore pair in right zone of petal III, two
more in posterior zones of petals II and IV, six more in outside zones
of petals I and V ; this character variable with specimens ; pores
conjugate, outer pore elongate transversely, inner smaller and round. |
|
Adoral interambulacra. - Single plate (text fig.152) at
peristome, preceded by two alternating plates, one much larger than
the other in interambulacrum 3, smaller plate adjacent to ambulacrum
III ; in interambulacra 1 and 4 smaller plate adjacent to ambulacra I
and V respectively ; in interambulacrum 5 adjacent to ambulacrum I ;
plates preceding these regularly alternating, of approximately equal
size.
Periproct. - Marginal to slightly supramarginal ; transverse with
slight groove at adoral side of opening.
Peristome. - Anterior, depressed, pentagonal.
Floscelle. - Bourrelets well developed (pl.28, fig.8) ; vertically
sided. Phyllodes (text fig.151) windened single pored, two
series in each half-ambulacrum ; seven or eight pores in each outer
series, four to five in each inner series ; buccal pores, sphaeridia
present.
Tuberculation. - Adorally, tubercles larger ; naked median band
in terambulacrum 5, short length at ambulacrum III.
Occurence. - Middle Eocene of France.
Location of type specimen. - According to Lambert and Jeannet
(1928, p.126) the type is in the Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines.
|
|
|
|
| |
Rhyncholampas
grignonensis
(Defrance, 1825) -
Lutétien moyen, Aisne, France, 33 mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|